DC
Dan Chapman
@chapmanresearch.bsky.social
Research Associate in the Center for Science Communication Research @ University of Oregon. Interested in environmental decision making and healthy ecosystems.
63 followers70 following90 posts
It read more like an endorsement of prereg and reg reports which is bizarre given the actual, ya know, reasons for retraction. It’s like the MA wasn’t was even on the required reading list.
Or the retracted paper tbh. No one quoted seems to have actually read it!
DC
Dan Chapman
@chapmanresearch.bsky.social
Research Associate in the Center for Science Communication Research @ University of Oregon. Interested in environmental decision making and healthy ecosystems.
63 followers70 following90 posts