Thanks. Equal number of CW and CCW Gabors, equal number of each cue type, but the expectation manipulation refers to a 75% likelihood of the particular orientation following the particular cue. Unexpected are the 25% trials. Of course with bold we do not know much about timecourse. If that answers!

Thanks Earl!

Great to meet you Ivan, thanks for helping to host a highly stimulating and enjoyable event!

Thanks Peter!

Ah thanks Micah, that's kind! It's actually just our lab's submissions (with newcomers Aaron and Quirin presenting work from previous labs), not a symposium, but that's great if you like it. We'll have to present it to you one day :-)

And finally, Cristiano Costa to discuss emotion and prediction. Please come to speak with us! Looking forward to science, chat and disco ! [9/9]

Quirin Gehmacher (also Juliane Schubert, Nathan Weisz, Maria Chait and others, Fri 2-3:45 pm) considers how gaze tracks envelope and acoustic onsets of attended speech [8/9]

Aaron Kaltenmaier (also @jhaarsma.bsky.social@smfleming.bsky.social@peterkok.bsky.social, Fri 2-3:45 pm) asks how expectations about stimulus presence and content differently affect perceptual inference [7/9]

Matan Mazor (@matanmazor.bsky.social; Fri 2-3:45 pm) considers the role of counterfactual visibility in perceptual decisions, examining whether we accumulate evidence for absence or represent the counterfactual to decide that something isn't there [6/9]

Matan Mazor & Nick Simpson (@matanmazor.bsky.social, also E Ward, K Rittershofer; Thur 3-5 pm) consider perceptual repulsion from lifelong gravitational priors, whether recently learnt expectations bias motion perception similarly, & adaptation vs prediction mechanisms [5/9]