Even that will be warped by the platform. The engagement reward influences all.

The last time you went to bat for a reporter for giving favorable treatment/equal space to absurd lies, it turned out she had a sexual relationship with the article in question’s subject. I’m a little hesitant to trust your judgment here.

Right, and it looks right now like that might actually work. They just have to not fuck it up

It’s not an insane argument from SCOTUS precedent, which seems to say “you must recite the magic words, ‘I am accepting this bribe for this official act’” for it to be a crime. He’s not disputing the quid, or the quo, but the “pro.” SCOTUS’s interpretation just permits laughably open corruption.

Ah, the old “pre-act gratuities” argument

I don’t think it’s out of the question that they *have* coordinated something, but might need to wait for a retrospective to piece together what’s happening

Regardless, *the rockets have not all been aimed there*! I don’t even know where this person read that. It seems completely made up

I don’t think you have enough information for your opinion to matter.

Rahm Emanuel should send them a wework postcard that just says “please don’t do this again”