Reading this latest Jack Smith filing, it occurred to me that people haven’t quite internalized the reality that in all three cases touching on the insurrection on January 6—by far the darkest day for our democracy since the Civil War—the Supreme Court sided with the insurrectionists in all three.

Make sure you pronounce the Chief Justice's name correctly: Tawn - ee

I am no legal expert, so I literally had no idea. It would be super-helpful if people who were experts -- and could talk to laypeople -- were out there explaining this and why it matters.

Jack Smith seems to be adhering to the principle of justice delayed is justice denied. But we're all going to have to really get a better understanding of why Joe picked Merrick Garland and why Merrick waited until the last minute to deal with the leader of an insurrection.

They had already signed off on it. Which is why the senior players we so confident of success and why Pence was so tempted to join them. Ultimately fear of consequences was all that stopped the obvious coup from proceeding, something they've taken into account fornext time

Yep it's Not Good

Oh no we get it

The six SCOTUS Rs, you mean.

I need to read after I write my mock appellate brief for appellate Advocacy class, and do all my reading for all my other classes. But I have noticed that.

They're siding with white nationalism and christofacism. The fact that it came in a red baseball cap is just a coincidence.

History repeating itself - the pre-Slavers’ Rebellion Supreme Court did a pretty good job encouraging the slavers that slavery was good and constitutional, actually.