They had a conversation whereby black redacted claimed they wanted to get their facts straight, and blue redacted offered additional information about trees and the earthen-mounds to help them. By the end, black redacted seemed satisfied with what they had learned. Until. . . 2/

Pseudo-archaeology is my bête-noire as Nazi-adjacent conspiracy theorising goes. It looks harmless and funny and you kinda just want to make fun of it, until you realise it’s a pipeline to Literal Fascism and most of it is based on shit invented by the original Nazis/their ideological compatriots.

Three days later, when black redacted is back to their narrative about trees damaging the site. Not out of genuine concern for the site, but to support their narrative that archaeologists are engaged in deliberate destruction of sites to hide [insert whatever truth]. Narrative overpowers facts. 3/3