Hey guys it turns out Axios is real mad. www.axios.com/2024/09/19/h...

Exclusive: Inside the Harris-Walz strategy of hiding from the media

The Harris-Walz ticket is on pace to do fewer interviews and press conferences than any major party's presidential pairing in modern U.S. history.

Don’t put in the paper that I was mad

It's rather telling that Axios published that tripe less than 48 hours after Harris did an extended discussion with the National Association of Black Journalists, thus again underscoring that Axios ____: www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-JF...

Kamala Harris speaks with National Association of Black Journalists | full video

YouTube video by CBS News

If you look at their breakdown it is clear that it is driven mostly by Vance. Remember, they pulled Vance’s campaigning to follow Harris around and…give interviews. Like this was a narrative they were creating the whole time by having Vance juice the numbers.

Axios has lost all credibility (and integrity).

God the bullet point style of that "article" reeks of corporate slide deck presentation. It's like having to sit through an Axios meeting. Trying to read through it and thinking "This article could have been an email"God the bullet point style of that "article" reeks of corporate slide deck presentation. It's like having to sit through an Axios meeting. Trying to read through it and thinking "This article could have been an email"

Is this Axios Tampa or Axios proper? (Not clicking)

This is the longest Axios piece I’ve ever seen, they really are mad

I suspect they’re still chasing the high of the Jonathan Swan interview

"Fuck their feelings." Am I doing this right?

“The press” refuses to acknowledge one angle in this strategy: Harris and Walz are signaling a presidency you won’t have to think about every day, as a contrast to Trump promising to be constantly at the center of every conversation in America. Political reporters know that will hurt their industry