I read the article. It was incoherent rambling based on wild assumptions. Ironic you would complain about the other guy’s “colossal arrogance” while being oblivious to your own.

So incoherent. If that were true, why bother to respond? What is going on is that you are trying to attack me because you can’t attack the logic. You don’t address any of the logic or facts I discuss, because, , why? I think it’s because you’re weak. Weak minded, stupid frankly.