my criticism of the ruling isn't "omg trump's immune" (the ruling never said that), but that it was basically "we have goalposts" and only vaguely gesturing at where the goalposts actually were it's okay to name categories, but they should've at least given hypothetical examples of each

like, what use is this kind of instruction when it's all just random guessing sure, "official acts" vs personal endeavors are different, and juries can usually find the difference. but the line between them is exceptionally gray, and jan 6 lands squarely in that gray area.