I think the problem w this that we've struggled with when trying to design such a thing is that there is so much heterogeneity in terms of which conspiracies are named, and which versions of a given consp are named. It makes it really hard to come up with canned debunks

if you don't want to decide yourself, one option is to use the data as the starting point & ask the LLM to make a combined version that addresses the most important points in people's concerns about each. another option is highest traffic three FCs about each or something