This one's especially funny - both tweets are specifically about Trump trying to overturn the 2020 election! There's no incitement to violence here, just commentary on how Trump, having lost, should be kicked out of office.
Every ad for sports gambling is like “make a 50 dollar bet, get 1000 dollars in free additional bets” and I really think the only way that business plan works is if you’re planning on getting someone so addicted that their life is completely ruined
We're so far out that I'm optimistic this doesn't matter - the voter who will return the ballot IMMEDIATELY is a (probably Dem) diehard. But yeah, Kennedy effectively slowed down early voting and the partisan NC court helped him do it. Just unrecognizable from the 90s RFK Jr.
RFK Jr. has thrown a grenade into the North Carolina election. He waited too long to remove his name from the ballot—then persuaded the far-right NC Supreme Court to do it anyway, an egregious violation of law that has canceled early voting indefinitely. slate.com/news-and-pol...
The North Carolina Supreme Court tossed a grenade into the state’s election on Monday.
No they don't. Undecided voters say they want to hear more policy because it's a fig leaf for the real reason they're undecided: they aren't paying attention and don't really care and/or are confused/intimidated by the whole thing. bsky.app/profile/nyti...
Undecided voters said Kamala Harris laid out a sweeping vision to fix some of the country’s most stubborn problems during last night’s presidential debate. But what they wanted to hear — and didn’t — was the fine print.
Voters said the vice president talked about a sweeping vision to fix the country’s most stubborn problems. But they wanted the fine print.
i can’t get myself in the headspace of a person who watched that debate and concluded that trump was stronger “on the facts” www.nytimes.com/2024/09/11/u...
Voters said the vice president talked about a sweeping vision to fix the country’s most stubborn problems. But they wanted the fine print.
The swipe at the media for not "giving a shit" before his tweet: NYT had front-page feature on Haitians in Springfield last week, with details about the Haitian man convicted after killing a kid with his van. I figured this was where he was going, but it's extra cheap and sleazy.
There's a "no brown M&Ms" issue here - similar with Dems not proof-reading their platform, and missing a couple of outdated Biden references. But yeah, the point of Harris 2024 is that it's a slightly reformulated Biden campaign, not a Harris 2020 campaign.
![Aaron Blake (WaPo reporter) quoting New Republic: “Unfortunately for Harris, [her issue page’s] release was undermined by a simple but telling error: The page’s source code revealed that parts of the platform were copied directly from Biden’s campaign page.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:vasmwozbxda25bah7d6sb3ja/bafkreicwxnhlglpucgg5rfxebwtdytcvfddvioqluntotzogajfplr7awm@jpeg)
Levels of online that science could scarcely imagine a few years ago
