BLUE
DW
Dom White
@domw.bsky.social
Chief economist at Absolute Strategy Research in London. On here I speak my own nonsense. Also found on websites including: Twitter dot com.
1.6k followers381 following1.6k posts
DWdomw.bsky.social

Those tools are meant to be more of a backstop rather than a facility for ongoing liquidity provision, right? So you'd think there would be some desire to stop b/s shrinkage before that kicks in?

1

PJpauljdavies.bsky.social

In the UK, they're definitely meant to be permanent liquidity provision to substitute for BoE gilt ownership. In the US, less so I think because the regime is meant to be "ample" rather than whatever we call the UK (adequate?). But the US SRF is meant to be used regularly eg. prob most Qr endsIn the UK, they're definitely meant to be permanent liquidity provision to substitute for BoE gilt ownership. In the US, less so I think because the regime is meant to be "ample" rather than whatever we call the UK (adequate?). But the US SRF is meant to be used regularly eg. prob most Qr ends

0
DW
Dom White
@domw.bsky.social
Chief economist at Absolute Strategy Research in London. On here I speak my own nonsense. Also found on websites including: Twitter dot com.
1.6k followers381 following1.6k posts