The central Rufo hypothesis is basically that Black women do not belong in public life. If they have gotten there, it is through deception, which he will expose. donmoynihan.substack.com/p/the-campai...

Damn you, do not bring that evidence thingy into play, I have a perfectly fabricated hypothesis that’s working just fine with the MAGAs.

I swear to God some Black woman gave him a B- or he met a Black woman who was getting a degree at the real Harvard and hos life has turned into an orgy of petty revenge. But this Black woman still knows more than he does, and is better educated. There's nothing he can do about that.

Why does the NYTimes keep talking to Rufo a man who has repeatedly and proudly admitted to being a propagandist.

This quote describes the dictionary definition of Confirmation Bias

jfc it was obvious from the opening statement of th GOP chair of the committee, at the 1st hearing with Harvard Pres, that the House hearing was an attack on lib education obvious far as I know, I'm the only one who complained about it AND wrote to the Times about this shit coverge

This is your periodic reminder that Rufo emerged from the primordial slime of the Discovery Institute, a creationist astroturf shop.

Chris Rufo's groyper assistant. Very subtle.

Phil Magness picked this up and of course is carrying water for Rufo. I don’t understand how he manages to be such a chode, but it certainly warrants study

Also, he's taking up public space with these accusations. Don't give him oxygen.

I mean, she "plagiarized" in her lit review. You know, the part where you talk about what other people have contributed to the field. Nobody with any level of academic credibility looked at the thing and took it seriously.