I am sad that the scholarship in our book is tinged with the ramifications of his abuse; many scholars in that volume depend on that publication for their careers. I feel ambivalent about promoting it now, even though I'm proud of what we put together & all the contributions.

Personally, it doesn’t make or break my CV if I promote this book or not; but that’s a privilege not everyone shares. I am all ears, if you’ve made it this far in the thread — what is the ethical balance on this?