I feel like I'm being trolled, either by Kessler, Hobbes, or both, but in any case the end result is that we are all more aware of the context for Harris's attacks than if Kessler hadn't written the fact-checker.

I also wouldn't assume that most people reading the fact checks are also reading the full context write-up. If you are only scrolling through and making a mental note of the "Verdict" Kessler has given, it gives the impression that Harris is an exaggerator who also plays fast and loose with facts