If my reading is correct and they are in a military base (?) you don't even need to go that far, military bases and other bastions of the state overseas e.g. embassies are deemed within the jurisdiction of the sending state by a long line of ECtHR juris e.g. Al-Saadoon

You just know that Badenoch straight up murdered someone with an answer like this

😂

Those poor students 😂 wish we had more time for devolution tbh (only 1 lecture) but the syllabus is packed and they're cut back lecture time since covid. Though we are looking at a second constit elective module right @paolosandro.bsky.social

Really? That is interesting.

Curious how much EU law people still have in their UK constitutional law syllabus + in what context you discuss it e.g. parliamentary sovereignty or devolution?

a promising career in airport runway management beckons

standard recruitment into higher education

thanks for the updates colin, any sign of the judgment publication?

juris says the next of kin must be involved to the ‘extent necessary to safeguard their interests’ (edwards v UK) but it has not been fleshed out a great deal in the jurisprudence. some cases where relatives have been frozen out challenging authorities e.g. janowiec v russia + finogenov v russia