I guess I can see why. š¤·āāļø
Not necessary. Itās an internet 101 risk, which has been taken advantage of for decades. Iām confident in my risk assessment that domain-based verification is still susceptible to easy spoofing with mis-spelled domains and alternate TLDs. No need to look at the protocol.
Thatās fine, but you havenāt stated one technical fact to dispute mine. You just came in with vague insults implying we donāt know what weāre talking about. I gave a very specific attack vector where domain names are susceptible to attacks by using misspellings.
With all due respect, I think I very clearly called out why the Bluesky domain-based verification system does not solve the problem that the old blue check system did, and why it wonāt solve the authorās issue. Obviously it works differently, so I donāt understand the point of the submarine comment.
even if thatās true for this one instance, my comment was about domain verification in general. It doesnāt really solve the problem any more than the new blue checks on twitter. In fact, disposable domains are far cheaper per year than blue checks.
Not only that, but the same issues arise. This imposter added an S to the username. They could just as easily buy a domain name with the same extra S and āverifyā with that domain, unless Iām overlooking something.
Same here.
I know you werenāt asking me, but Iāve been a big fan of the Logitech Keys, and now Keys Mechanical, along with the Mx Master 3 mouse. I prefer a good mouse over a trackpad, and the keyboard feels much better to me than the multiple apple externals I own.
Damn. Thatās unfortunate, but thanks for the reply.
How do you like the qnap os? Iāve been using synology for ages and love the ease of containers and extra raid options (shr2 is great for home use). But better ssd/nvme integration would be huge. Maybe I should consider a move during my next refresh cycle.