It’s entirely possible that the NYT employs people who aren’t sex offenders, but there have never been any double blind studies that prove that they do not

also: interesting, presuming there may be non-sex offenders employed, that they haven't come out loudly and often against their sex offender colleagues.

either way, i think that the position that sex offenders should be allowed to write op eds is a radical one out of line with most voters

while there is extensive literature suggesting that op-ed columnists aren't socially predisposed to pedophilia, in the interests of examining all facets of the issue we've polled a number of angry transsexuals on social media for their perspective

suspicious IMO; shouldn't there be higher-quality research if they aren't trying to cover something up?