BLUE
Profile banner
ER
Evan Roberts
@evanrobertsnz.bsky.social
Social, demographic, & economic history @UMNews HMED & Population Studies. Coffee, photos, Dylan, urban & transit fan, road & trail runner. Constructive, loving critic of where I live (Minneapolis) and where I'm from (Wellington) @evanrobertsnz most places
838 followers840 following1.1k posts
ERevanrobertsnz.bsky.social

Two suburbs joining the slow moving trend to legalize ADUs: New Brighton and Falcon Heights. Both allow provision for reasonable sized ADUs (~ 1000 square ft, 2 bedrooms), but retain an owner occupancy requirement. www.startribune.com/new-brighton...

New Brighton, Falcon Heights to allow accessory dwelling units
New Brighton, Falcon Heights to allow accessory dwelling units

The suburbs join several cities across Minnesota that now allow the units, also known as mother-in-law apartments.

1

ERevanrobertsnz.bsky.social

Ownership provisions are understandable when cities introduce ADUs because they are thinking of the first generation of people building and owning these: moving grandma in, or whatever the initial motivation is. But owner occupancy requirements limit the market when properties are sold

3
Profile banner
ER
Evan Roberts
@evanrobertsnz.bsky.social
Social, demographic, & economic history @UMNews HMED & Population Studies. Coffee, photos, Dylan, urban & transit fan, road & trail runner. Constructive, loving critic of where I live (Minneapolis) and where I'm from (Wellington) @evanrobertsnz most places
838 followers840 following1.1k posts