Goldfish phenomics reveals commonalities and a lack of universality in the domestication process for ornamentation doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by Kévin Le Verger et al.
Abstract. Domestication process effects are manifold, affecting genotype and phenotype, and assumed to be universal in animals by part of the scientific co
Dandelions use urban heat to their advantage: they grow better at higher temperatures doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by Yannick Woudstra et al. 📷: Yannick Woudstra
The structure of the environment influences the patterns and genetics of local adaptation doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by Tom R Booker
Abstract. Environmental heterogeneity can lead to spatially varying selection, which can, in turn, lead to local adaptation. Population genetic models have
Unraveling mate choice evolution through indirect genetic effects doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by Chang S Han et al.
Abstract. Attractiveness is not solely determined by a single sexual trait but rather by a combination of traits. Because the response of the chooser is ba
Genomic patterns in the dwarf kingfishers of northern Melanesia reveal a mechanistic framework explaining the paradox of the great speciators. doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by Devon A DeRaad et al.
Abstract. The paradox of the great speciators describes a contradictory biogeographic pattern exhibited by numerous avian lineages in Oceania. Specifically
Could intergenomic compatibility shape fitness in insect populations? doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by Stefano Bettinazzi et al.
Abstract. Mitochondrial function depends on the effective interactions between proteins and RNA encoded by the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Evidence
How does the same genome make a caterpillar, pupa, and butterfly? doi.org/10.1093/evle...@evolletters.bsky.social by James G DuBose and Jacobus C de Roode 📷: James G DuBose
Does the inherent sex difference in gamete size drive sex roles? In a recent @evolletters.bsky.socialdoi.org/10.1093/evle...
Evolutionary theory predicts the difference in gamete size b/w females and males explains the direction of sexual selection. Two studies seem to provide contradictory evidence, but a study in @evolletters.bsky.socialdoi.org/10.1093/evle...
Abstract. Darwin and Bateman suggested that precopulatory sexual selection is more intense on males than females, and that this difference is due to anisog