BLUE
G
Gruff
@fropome.bsky.social
Damned fool
3 followers29 following27 posts
Gfropome.bsky.social

But that machine can't do what you can, and is reliant on your input. I don't think they can ever be a replacement for human art, certainly if they're not allowed to feast on everything in an unlimited way. It's a cheap version of what humans do.

2

Gfropome.bsky.social

Put another way, should people be allowed to sell art to be input into these engines? If they're properly licensed and limited, I don't see them as problematic tbh. It's the current parasitic approach that seems to be the big problem.

1
ADadamiani.bsky.social

Depends on what you mean by ‘a replacement’— because there certainly seem to be a great number of applications where ‘immediate’ and ‘essentially free’ appear to outweigh any kind of human quality. It’s certainly hurting people already.

1
G
Gruff
@fropome.bsky.social
Damned fool
3 followers29 following27 posts