Maybe the question should be “how many do you think will fight back”?

Yet SCOTUS effectively put it’s imprimatur on this line of thinking by determining that if you can’t prove a blatant quid pro quo there’s no crime and if done after the favor is provided it’s a mere gratuity. That’s far more corrosive. Indeed, the lawyer who doesn’t make this argument is incapable.

So, I’m not as old as Biden even though what I’m about to say may seem old. And I am white, so there’s that. But, fuck them crackers!

open.substack.com/pub/thelefth... Absolutely required viewing

open.substack.com/pub/thelefth... Absolutely required viewing on this subject

How Can Democrats Grow a Spine and Go On Offense Against Trump?

In this Chai Talk, I chart a course correction for Democrats with Lincoln Project co-founder and former GOP strategist Rick Wilson that can galvanize the majority to defeat Trump and MAGA.

Little Ronny told big bad Donny to get a maxi pad for his face for the blood coming out of whatever

Hilarious! I spent 15 minutes once trying to figure that out. It is a most counterintuitive device.

Serious American www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...www.msn.com/en-us/news/o...img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/e...

How the US supreme court shredded the Constitution and what can be done to repair it | Laurence H Tribe

Court’s troubling rulings on presidential immunity and regulatory power make it clear that change is an ethical essential

The real travesty of media coverage is the lack of reporting as to how we’ve become such an unserious country. The fact that one of the two major parties is in lockstep to deliver a form of totalitarianism to the masses and the other is not up to the task of preventing it is under reported IMO.

I never understood how the hair on fire crowd couldn’t do basic math and see that 34% extreme right could ever out perform the remaining 66% left and center coalitions in the second phase of the election.