HN
Health Nerd
@gidmk.bsky.social
Epidemiologist. Writer (TIME, Guardian, Stat, etc). PhDing at UoW Host of senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him
3.8k followers218 following407 posts
I don't find that comment surprising - publishers have made it clear that they don't think it's important to check for fraud
I mostly agree about catching fraud*, but catching mistakes? I didn’t know that it was a mainstream view that that’s beyond the purview of peer review. Of course it won’t catch them all, but catching mistakes should be an aim of the peer review process.
HN
Health Nerd
@gidmk.bsky.social
Epidemiologist. Writer (TIME, Guardian, Stat, etc). PhDing at UoW Host of senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him
3.8k followers218 following407 posts