And that was an excellent response from Walz! (I'm not going to comment on every little thing the whole time, I'm just getting to know the field here)
So when it comes to climate change, Vance's take is "let's just assume, as a CRAZY hypothetical, that carbon emissions actually affect the atmosphere", and then he explains how Dem policies have made American manufacturing less toxic than the overseas factories US businesses fled to
Walz's rebuttal was much better. And, surprisingly, the moderator is doing a good thing.
"People were afraid of stepping out of line" Um, no, the most dangerous men in the world were mostly friendly with Trump.
and Vance is going straight to "I was born a poor black veteran who didn't know how to dance" -_-
Sooo Walz going straight to the prepared attack and ignoring the question entirely. Cool. That could have been a good preamble to saying why or why Israel should not attack Iran, but
I'm guessing that they aren't live fact-checking because of complaints from the Trump camp. As we've known since Dubya, reality has a well-known liberal bias.
What are they doing to deserve the title “moderators”? www.huffpost.com/entry/us-ele...
CBS News says it will be up to the candidates, not the moderators, to fact-check each other.
"We're going to turn this whole country red, with Donald Trump's leadership" is pretty fucking ominous sounding.
It’s a good thing this isn’t Joe Biden or the papers might notice it