This work would not have been possible under the data policy CMS proposed (and thankfully postponed). Under that policy, we'd need to use the VRDC, which was too expensive even with our generous NIA grant. I'm hopeful CMS will keep listening to researchers' concerns here.
Our new study in JAMA Network Open finds that randomized overprescribing warning letters safely reduced antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia. The paper: jamanetwork.com/journals/jam... Authors: Harnisch @mlbarnett.bsky.social @coussens.bsky.social Thomas Olfson Berhane + me
This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial examines whether warning letters to high prescribers of quetiapine are associated with reduced
Good news for researchers who use Medicare data #EconSky
Congratulations to CMS and the Administration on today's announcement delaying implementation of this change! For the reasons we give in the quoted link, CMS can maintain data security while improving research access policies. It's great to see CMS responding to feedback. Announcement is here:
Scholar-hero Tymofiy Mylovanov will be back in town next week. If you are available, please join @ksonin.bsky.social@monikanalepa.bsky.social, and me for a conversation with Tymofiy, Wed, Feb 21, 3:00 to 4:00. Registration and details at the link.
Submission Deadline Approaching: NBER's Economic Analysis of Regulation meeting in Cambridge. Papers are due by Feb 15th and can be uploaded to the conference page here: www.nber.org/calls-papers...
This is a nightmare for researchers and a total own-goal for good health policy. Policy announcement is here: www.cms.gov/data-researc...
Just got the email from CMS that they are planning to discontinue physical access to the Medicare/Medicaid research files and force everyone to use the (incredibly expensive) VRDC. In the transition, they'll charge physical data users $10K/year to renew DUAs. This is bad.