They are definitely way past either of those. They were only 3 years apart.

That's all well and good when the opposing candidate hasn't threatened to turn the military against his political rivals, anti-war protestors, etc, and has a think tanks plan to achieve his anti-democratic goals. We can't choose a politician who is against genocide if there is no democracy.

And that just ignores that of the two, Trump will let Bibi get away with anything. I can engage with activist groups to try to sway Kamala on this. Trump does not give a single fuck about the Palestinian people and never will, especially based on liberal pressure. It's the least shitty option.

A vote is not endorsement. Abstaining from voting or protest voting because you can't handle the cognitive dissonance of voting for someone who supports Israel is not the moral high ground. It's not negotiable because there are no options that do not support Israel.

Hey I voted for Stein in 2012. That was a very different election though. The fact that she is ok with the fact that she may act as a spoiler in an election with the stakes this high is fucked up and says a lot about her. Our system is fucked, but a vote for Jill won't do shit to change that.

Voting for Harris doesn't mean you think genocide is negotiable. Of the two, she is most likely to do something about it, or at least less likely to escalate it. A presidential vote in the US system is not endorsement. It's about choosing the best of 2 options, or sometimes the less shitty option.

They paid for Twitter and are holding out hope we're going back.

Thank you for being there to explain why I hate modern Christmas lights and why our democracy is so fucked.

Not wrong they have more peanut butter

Think you gotta play it another 2 times because what the fuck actually happened