BLUE
Profile banner
JG
Julie Greene
@greeneland.bsky.social
Labor and immigration historian @UofMaryland. Editor, Labor: Studies in Working-Class History. Author of The Canal Builders.
762 followers386 following75 posts
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

I wondered about that too! Thanks, Laura.

0
Reposted by Julie Greene
KKkevinkenny.bsky.social

The term ā€œfree white personā€ in the foundational 1790 Naturalization Act discriminated by race, and among those classified as whiteā€”as @greeneland.bsky.social notesā€”it discriminated by class. šŸ§µ2/3

1
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Thanks Anna! Yes Iā€™ve been digging in and the main explanation I see is exactly thatā€” excluding indentured servants. Zolberg eg says that. Still wanting to know more about the thinking. Their understanding of ā€œfreeā€ may be as complex as what they meant by white.

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Thanks and same back to you!

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

My thinking is that ā€œfreeā€ was a class designation, ie requiring some property ownership, not purely a racial one. Trying to sort that out.

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Looks good. Thanks!

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Thanks! Iā€™m thinking seriously about this one.

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Thanks! Great to be reminded of these.

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Interesting idea, thanks John!

0
JGgreeneland.bsky.social

Thanks for the votes! Have been thinking about Winant and Cindyā€™s book I know works well. As does Windham! Adding Haley to my list.

0
Profile banner
JG
Julie Greene
@greeneland.bsky.social
Labor and immigration historian @UofMaryland. Editor, Labor: Studies in Working-Class History. Author of The Canal Builders.
762 followers386 following75 posts