Apart from Nero, which run to jazz of any kind?
This is certainly not how AI improves the world.
Was the cat called Wenlock? Looks like a Wenlock to me.
The basic concept, which is all thatâs needed, should be pointed out by technical advisers, whether or not they are asked to explain. Any basically intelligent person can grasp that principle. Politicians may choose to follow a political path thereafter. Thatâs their choice.
But thatâs because they didnât understand the less formal meaning either. In any case, how many politicians, civil servants, business people donât understand this kind of thing? They might want to cover it up, but thatâs different from failing to understand this simple idea.
Problem is, when you use the descriptive version (âŚly) a new more general meaning becomes equally acceptable, as in this online definition: dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/e...
1. an increase in the size or the importance of something that becomes quickerâŚ
Only four miles. A nice walk both ways.
Revamping the fiscal rules without technical economist justification looks like flouting the rules.
If the article is to be believed, the government is searching for money down the back of the sofa. I donât think thatâs the kind of optimism they can credibly aim for. With limited time, and a huge majority, they must rise to the level of the big picture.