i think also in the context of a high-trust relationship it is a useful additional contextual signal while having a back and forth, similarly to the way emoji reacts allow explicit acknowledgment without interruption

that’s the whole point of prediction markets

this was a good time. wish we could go back

fyi, asheville is not below the dam in question, it’s on the other side of a mountain range

disable cups if you run linux

it’s not gaming the rules if the rules are the game

seems to have leaked early

or maybe you have a mechanism where there’s an auction for the “censorship rate” and then the censor pays to censor a post and is charged time * rate and when they run out of budget it’s uncensored again

one idea is to target a fixed rate of hidden posts (eg 1 per hour) and then have bidders compete for winning a censorship slot

i think that if labeler subscriptions were public some of these problems would be tractable, different labelers could have different audience bases