I guess we can just read these notices like: “these posts weren’t removed because they don’t go against our community guidelines… in Kenya.” from now on But it is ridiculous and infuriating

I hope they enjoy it! It’s a super engaging read. The chapters aren’t too cumbersome either so it propels you forward and it’s quite well organized :)

Came here to say something similar

My substack is always free for all to read with an option to support if you feel like it fwiw 🫶

This is a classic strong man tactic— one has only to look at Mussolini himself and of course Hitler to see it for what it is. Awful and I really hope that outside secret service detail (which was already absurd when he requested it in 2015/6 before being elected) he is denied these things

Or maybe like community notes so context can be added and enjoyed because woof

Finally wrapping up with irrelevant and inapplicable comparisons This is why media literacy is so imperative and reading with a critical eye is necessary. Didn’t need to read this to know it was going to be 💩 but anyway ✌️

The article then further presents an opinion as fact then fails to provide meaningful evidence. If this were a news story OR an opinion the format is sloppy and misleading at best

The article presents the View question as one about leadership, not policy. When asked about PAST policy she said Biden was fine. WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? This is unserious. It’s looking for issues where there are none, pushing the idea that Harris is a mystery when she’s clear, concise, upfront

I knew it was AI because the numbers of willing participants were higher than IRL ;)