BLUE
Profile banner
HS
Hideki Sato
@hidekis.bsky.social
Assistant Prof at Fukushima Medical University | CBT, depression, rumination, patient‐reported outcome measures | sites.google.com/view/hideki-sato-repository
117 followers235 following95 posts
Reposted by Hideki Sato
AHdrandreahoward.bsky.social

If I had to recommend just one thing for people to include on their OSF project pages, it’s a “read me” file that provides essentially a table of contents and/or list of instructions for what files to look at, and in what order, to reproduce elements of a corresponding manuscript.

1
Reposted by Hideki Sato
RCruben.the100.ci

New post at The 100% CI: Do we have a problem with construct and measure proliferation in psychology? It depends who you ask and it varies by subdiscipline. We respond to a recent piece by Iliescu et al. and try to find some common ground. www.the100.ci/2024/03/22/o...

Treemap of psychological measures
Entropy over time is fairly stagnant in psych disciplines
How often measures are (re)used
1
HShidekis.bsky.social

COSMINチームによる2型糖尿病患者の身体機能を測定するPROMsの系統的レビュー。 drc.bmj.com/content/10/3...

0
Reposted by Hideki Sato
DLlucyfoulkes.bsky.social

"even if data are quantitative and numerical, the ways in which they are analysed and, to a greater extent, the inferences made from this analysis, will vary depending on who the researcher is." I LOVE this paper, which talks about reflexivity in quant, not qual, research tinyurl.com/3r3s39ty

Reflexivity is the act of examining one's own assumption, belief, and judgement systems, and thinking carefully and critically about how these influence the research process. The practice of reflexivity confronts and questions who we are as researchers and how this guides our work. It is central in debates on objectivity, subjectivity, and the very foundations of social science research and generated knowledge. Incorporating reflexivity in the research process is traditionally recognized as one of the most notable differences between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Qualitative research centres and celebrates the participants' personal and unique lived experience. Therefore, qualitative researchers are readily encouraged to consider how their own unique positionalities inform the research process and this forms an important part of training within this paradigm. Quantitative methodologies in social and personality psychology, and more generally, on the other hand, have remai
9
HShidekis.bsky.social

項目反応理論を用いた症状評価項目バンクの現状と今後の課題 www.ism.ac.jp/editsec/touk...

0
Reposted by Hideki Sato
NRnatrevpsych.bsky.social

Positive affect and reward processing in the treatment of depression, anxiety and trauma Review by Michelle G. Craske, Barnaby D. Dunn, Alicia E. Meuret, Sakina J. Rizvi & Charles T. Taylor 🚨FREE to access until Sep 30! go.nature.com/3XqwRkd#psychology#psychscisky#clinicalpsych

0
Reposted by Hideki Sato
KMkevinmkruse.bsky.social
HShidekis.bsky.social

貧困率が高く識字率が低いマダガスカルの農村農家を対象に心理尺度を開発したところ,全員が同じ得点で分散がゼロ(!)になってしまい,心理測定学的な適応ができなくなる。その後,一人称表記,質問項目,応答ラベルなどの改良を重ねて,ぎりぎり許容できる分散と内的一貫性を示したという論文。いろいろと考えさせられる。 www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/pers...

Table 2. Items and descriptive statistics of motivation scale from Study 1 (n=24)
0
Profile banner
HS
Hideki Sato
@hidekis.bsky.social
Assistant Prof at Fukushima Medical University | CBT, depression, rumination, patient‐reported outcome measures | sites.google.com/view/hideki-sato-repository
117 followers235 following95 posts