2/ Brilliant minds gave perspectives about coordinating scientific quality control in practice 1) for promotions & getting tenure, 2) at journals pre- and post-publication, and 3) in error detection projects. How do you think our community can organize to repair and prevent scientific errors?

Check out this possible flow for journals post-publication;

3/ We also wrote a Transparency statement for this output, and added roles to #CredITTaxonomycredit.niso.org). If you have thoughts about this statement or ideas about other things we could have mentioned, let us know!