Sorry, I was not trying to call out the nytimes in particular I just don't believe that you can say any description of anything is completely "objective". It just doesn't exist. You always endorse a certain viewpoint through language, etc. We often do it subconciously.

JB made no claim about objectivity. He pointed out that description is not necessarily endorsement. You then claimed that no description can be objective, which is not actually a rebuttal of the description =/ endorsement point. I can describe something I do not endorse, even if I'm not objective.

Some 80 years ago Orwell wrote that "all writing is political", so, um, yay for rediscovering that principle, I guess

You're being really weird about this.

Why have you decided to inflict these banal observations on Bouie specifically, is I think what we are missing here

Go find someone who made that specific claim and argue with them.

For someone clamoring about percieved imprecision of other people's posts, you're a big wet sloppy word bag leaking all over the place