Astute readers of this bit of damage control, written by one of the Supreme Court's premier access journalists, will note that it does not actually say anything about how John Roberts has been "confounded" by Donald Trump www.cnn.com/2024/10/08/p...
I think she meant to say “co-founded.”
Yes, but does she have the justices over for garden parties? Then write books about her friendship with them? Is she really that “premier,” if not?
proud to be an astute reader https://bsky.app/profile/jadubin5.bsky.social/post/3l5zidpqj642f
Say what you will about Roberts, but he's a smart guy and I'll never believe he doesn't understand what's going on
Funny way of writing "conspires with", I have to say.
Guy who helped destroy the court's legitimacy suddenly seems concerned about other people noticing what he did.
Hes another Taney
Pardon me while I puke.
Being "shaken" by the fact that the public hates your most famous pro-Trump decision is not being "confounded" by Trump (or the "realities" of Trump). It actually seems like Roberts understands Trump pretty well! It's everyone else that he doesn't really get.
