You’re totally gonna do this now. And once or twice in the next three years, it’ll be revolutionary.
I mean, at least i didn’t choose 103.
It’s confusing correlation with causation, and also an oversimplification of a complex system with many, many variable factors, not to mention the way we get drawn to the surface features rather than the active (often hidden) ingredients.
Have DMed you
Would you like a chat about implications of bringing in curriculum? There’s a *lot* to be aware of.
Looking forward to reading this!
I guess everyone will say diff things. I’d say take a look in our SP2 unit. It’s not focused on them drawing axes - just reading, plotting points and interpreting. Scales are important, of course, but for that group at that level, I’d say it’s not the main thing in this unit.
Yes, but there are some things that just have to be done (eg entering beh. points onto SIMS) that benefit the system.
Lesson planning and prep, students writing essays… If the thinking is important to learning and development, keep AI away. If it’s making a mundane task *that has no developmental purpose* quicker, bring it on.