So: - murdering and raping a rave and kibbutzes, because there's no way to successfully attack a genuine military target - murdering a building full of families, because that's the only way to successfully attack a genuine military target. Which is worse? (A variant on a 2021 tweet of mine:)

You have described two atrocities: not net zero or net <1

Singling out & trying to compare or ‘rate’ specific atrocities ignores the overall context. One group is the occupier & immensely well-armed ongoing persecutor. The other is occupied & oppressed, under long-term siege with ever growing loss of land & no end in sight. It is not two equal groups.