But isn't the question whether a professor looking to lateral might think a Supreme Court clerkship would be helpful? And as a Georgetown alum, if someone interesting in lateraling there asked me if I thought if a S.Ct. clerkship would be a good credential to add, I'd be inclined to say "yes."

FWIW, of the two Notre Dame professors who have clerked so far, one has since lateraled.

*some relevant*

For relevant some post-Dobbs commentary: chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2022...www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/rethi...

Not book length, but a starting point if you're interested in reading more: scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworki...

This week, California filed an important suit against a hospital for refusing emergency abortion care. But that hospital is part of a large Catholic chain and is likely to raise religion in defense. This defense would have been laughable even a decade ago. But healthcare refusal has been legitimized

My thanks to Orin Kerr for inviting me to respond to Judge Reed O’Connor’s recent speech on judge-shopping—which accused law professors of “increasingly teach[ing] students to presume malicious intention on the part of judges with whom they disagree.” reason.com/volokh/2024/...

Stephen Vladeck Replies to Judge Reed O'Connor on Forum Selection and Judge-Shopping

A few days ago, my co-blogger Josh Blackman posted some very interesting remarks about forum selection and judge-shopping from Judge Reed O'Connor

Very good to know!

Second reprint in as many weeks!* "Law Office History and the Unrelenting Attack on Public Accommodations Law" Also available online: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... * Don't be too impressed. The last ones came in 2020.

Second reprint in as many weeks!* "Law Office History and the Unrelenting Attack on Public Accommodations Law" Also available online: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... * Don't be too impressed. The last ones came in 2020.