Another* explanation, of course, is that Haidt’s target audience are not other researchers but the general public. I’ve written about why I think that’s bad for science in this blog: www.the100.ci/2021/07/08/a... * additional, not necessarily alternative

Do I know anyone who has access to the full Altmetrics API, s.t. we can query not just the counts of mentions on various social media for papers, but also the *full text* of those mentions? How much does it cost? #scienceofscience

Yes, CoPilot, the encoding is indeed terrible.

I agree with you that it’s a win for science. Also the idea that people are more open to persuasion and evidence is generally a normative good thing I think. Curious if there any good books that have summarized what we now know in social psych post-replication crisis?

TYSM for making this! 🙏🙏🙏

I have a challenge for you: Where can I go online to find examples of great papers (clear, rigorous, theorized soundly, etc.)? I'm looking for the opposite of RetractionWatch.

I'd be interested in joining in on this!

So here's a synthesis of our research on reproducibility and the need for scientific pluralism 👇🏼 👩🏻‍🔬🧪#philsci

Tired: data police Wired: data social workers

tl;dr as an epistemic stance