That's a completely separate rant, tho, so I'll stop there. But seriously: nothing about law review makes sense. (And the argument that it is good for the STUDENTS is no answer to why we use this system to decide what counts as good legal SCHOLARSHIP.)

Not a peer review story as my piece was guaranteed acceptance, but my one law review article (at a less prestigious school) was mangled by the law students, who introduced errors into the piece, not all of which I managed to catch and correct.