“Radical trans activists”= 1) Trans people trying to live their lives without being abused 2) Cis people who think trans people should be able to live their lives free from abuse 3) People who are familiar with Martin Niemoller’s poem
You might think that an article about kids being fast-tracked into hormones and surgery would include a single example of a kid being fast-tracked into hormones and surgery but nope! www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/o...
Trans activists have pushed an ideological extremism by pressing for an unproven treatment orthodoxy.
New York Times is always happy to publish absolute trash with no supporting evidence. Just like The Guardian. And just call it being fair and balanced.
There are no radical trans activists. There are plenty of radical fascist conservatives, though.
not 110% sure about yalls constitution, but since when does a press pass legalize those levels of incitement? also kinda thought the idea is that people doing their jobs wrong on malicious purpose should not keep them?
-Kids being pushed to be trans, or gay -child furries who need litterboxes Have there ever actually been any of these, that they have seen? Or female athletes who feel threatened by trans women in their sport? But they believe in them anyway. Always reasons why wacko theories never have evidence.
"Unproven treatment orthodoxy" = the only treatment available and that has ever shown effectiveness.
I’m only a radical trans when I break out my skateboard.
Scusi but which trans activist put a knife to her throat? Her parents never heard of therapy until their child is old enough to be sure of which gender she wants to be? Is the NYT condemning the money making system that takes advantage of her confusion? Not sure the NYT is that ethical.