Judge Chutkan now brings up the Fischer ruling, which narrowed "corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding." Lauro wants to file entirely new motion. Chutkan: I'm inclined to vacate my denial of motion to dismiss on statutory grounds and to simply seek supplemental briefing (via Roger Parloff)

Me trying to parse "vacate my denial of motion to dismiss"

a man in pajamas is jumping in the air in a room .

ALT: a man in pajamas is jumping in the air in a room .

Lauro talks about discovery issues related to immunity—but also alludes to need for "Brady material" (exonerating evidence) Chutkan: Brady is an ongoing obligation. Any reason to believe there's Brady material they haven't already turned over? (unclear answer from Lauro) (via Roger Parloff)

Ok, I'm lost...