But okay, if “AI is bad at writing” won’t convince you, and “AI is bad for writers” won’t convince you, and even “AI is bad for *your* writing” won’t convince you, maybe you could try on “AI will destroy the environment in the pursuit of being bad.”
AI does not satisfy my urge to write.
Not even the fact that it is literally just autocomplete gets people. They refuse to stop thinking that theres something else in there, use too many toy examples as evidence of usefulness, and don't realize how much their own goddamn minds are doing the work anyway
I wish. Then they go "well just using computers in general is bad for the environment! Can't stop using computers now, can we?" 🤦
Apparently this is the argument that works best with HS and uni/college students, or so I’ve been reading.
Considering how people react to climate change, I don’t see why this would move people.
Green arguments always makes people shut their ears.
LOVING IIIIIIT!
Ohoho, it does nothing. I have used that argument as an opener. Prepare to have eyes roll at you.