BLUE
K
Kathryn
@katn.bsky.social
Editor of mostly scholarly things; (very) occasional feral Victorianist.
296 followers257 following318 posts
Kkatn.bsky.social

If you haven't already, join me in wishing our colleague and comrade @rcolesworthy.bsky.social—truly the very best of us—a happy birthday, won't you?

1
Kkatn.bsky.social

We don't actually need to keep showing our throats to the tech bros.

0
Kkatn.bsky.social

The only correct stance for any scholarly press to be taking on its own or its authors' potential use of genAI is "lol, no."

0
Kkatn.bsky.social

Yeah, I know. I'm like, wtf; I did not sign off on this.

1
Kkatn.bsky.social

University websites have become basically unnavigable. I spent 30 minutes the other day trying to find direct contact info for a fairly prominent prof in Australia. It was not in any of what you or I might think were the logical spots.

1
Kkatn.bsky.social

Done. Thank you.

0
Kkatn.bsky.social

The stance every scholarly press *should* be taking on LLMs is an unqualified "fuck no," of course. But we'll undoubtedly see more presses than we would like being more tolerant of them than we would like, though I don't think many will sink to Routledge's depths.

0
Kkatn.bsky.social

I was having a conversation about this on Twitter, and now know that Minnesota and Lever are among these publishers. If you know of others, feel free to chime in—we should probably get a list going.

1
Kkatn.bsky.social

Lolsob, as we used to say

0
K
Kathryn
@katn.bsky.social
Editor of mostly scholarly things; (very) occasional feral Victorianist.
296 followers257 following318 posts