Every successful remake/adaptation/etc. Iâve seen has a weirdly specific take on the source material. Which is a risk, sure, but are any of these franchises putting butts in the seat on name recognition alone anymore? Mass markets may not be sophisticated, but no one wants to be bored.
Not a single franchise pictured here where the âsuper fanâ advice wouldnât just be âfewer women and black peopleâ
And far fewer trench coats than I was expecting, tbh
Thereâs a lot to unpack in terms of predation & perversion but I also think thereâs a thread here to Cornell of the general acceptance of schools as proto-carceral environments. (And, actually, in both contexts predatory perversion and punishment go hand in hand.)
So disingenuous to conflate the specific argument about fact-checking debates w/ like your auntâs FB posts about âlyinâ Donald.â Not being able to lie incessantly actually DID hinder Trumpâs debate performance; Vance was âsmoothâ and âconfidentââŚexcept when he got flustered about being fact-checked.
Artificial Intelligence wonât see your posts but people namedâAlâ will and briefly think a stranger hates them.
7 yo watched part of the debate and asked why Vance wants to âbuild a wallâ. Luckily, weâd just seen an episode of Sabrina the Teenage Witch where the mean cheerleader joins the science club then tries to keep a bunch of people out.
I sought out your review of this episode over the weekend because this episode got under my skin so much. Many shows get at media circus and criminal injustice, but I donât think anyoneâs done a better job of contrasting the complexity of truth w/ the systemâs utter indifference to it.
Also, the first question out the gate used preemptive strike against another country as a litmus test for supporting Israelânot, say, âHow do we end the conflict?â