I'm confused, why would he veto a bill and then do the same thing?

Selectively taking part of it, which banning surgeries that don't happen anyway is pretty meaningless (in fact that provision in other challenged laws tends to not be challenged), but they will be doing more of this non legislatively likely to attempt to make it harder to seek legal remedy

Consistency, forethought and general understanding of reality isn’t exactly DeWine’s MO.