Seriously, my first book was about people who insisted that civil rights laws led to "restrictions of certain other rights." They were segregationists who believed they had a clear "right" to pick their neighbors, their kids' classmates, their customers. They called it "freedom of association."
And of course fifty years later the Court agreed with them in Masterpiece Cakeshop.
We just kind of pretend those “partner events” aren’t happening. They can’t get accepted on the regular program so they buy their way in. It is a bad compromise with a lot of backstory.
Freedom of association: who I sit with at the bar. Not freedom of association: who buys the house next to me.
“ Claremont Institute” as a partner says it all
They have to protect the character of the community, don't they?
If you go to a Planning Commission or City Council meeting for the approval of multi-family housing, you will see that many people still think this.
So they were demanding safe spaces to be a racist, sexist, classist? Huh, I thought that was what HOAs were for.
The right that upheld all other rights, indeed 🙃
Hillsdale College? Yikes
They truly do not understand that every single "right" and "freedom" exists with the "your fist/my nose" corollary appended to it.