Instead of reporting on how wildly uninformed some swing voters are, maybe the NYT could devote those resources into informing all voters about the issues?
But Kevin, it would be a sin for journalism to DO anything
Fourth Estate my ass
On a long enough timeline, every company becomes a social media site.
NYT's politics desk is just a Schrodinger's box now. Every candidate can be too much or not enough, a good unknown or bad unknown, a truth or a lie depending on how they feel. There's no need to inform. After all, who can really know a candidate in their heart? Schrodinger's reporting.
I for one will not be convinced until they consult with the Denny's Council of Oracles.
PRECISELY
But that would be running contrary to their goal which is to help elect Trump.
I'm pretty sure her campaign could hand the NYT a detailed policy document and they'd still feign confusion about "what it is, exactly, that she plans to do"
But how to get low information voters to WANT to be informed?
Yes! Do that. I am so tired of hearing what these uninformed twatwaffles think.