These kinds of arguments are so odd. “The future of education hinges on accepting that there’s no substantive difference between actually knowing how to do something and pretending you know how to do it. To remain relevant, schools must make showing how you pretended to do it central to assessment.”
The essay assessment is only the most obvious casualty of generative AI. Janice Kay, Chris Husbands and Jason Tangen explain why AI should prompt a total overhaul of education strategies
Goodhart's law: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
Agree, it's a very strange article overall. And no mention of the exam which is still a key part of assesment in almost all subjects.
Trumpette lawyer Alina Habba famously says she'd rather be pretty than smart, because she can 'fake being smart' We can't build a safe future for humanity with people like this.
A retired VC, his consultancy grifting colleague & a prof working with the security-criminal industrial complex walk into an essay…yes, sounds like a bad joke listening to these 3 that have no clue about classroom teaching and assessments
Yes! This is a resignation