Nice to see the NYT covering this, but it’d be even nicer if it started to dominate The Narrative like it did with Biden
"Former President Donald J. Trump vividly recounted how the audience at his climactic debate with Vice President Kamala Harris was on his side. Except that there was no audience. The debate was held in an empty hall. No one 'went crazy,' as Mr. Trump put it, because no one was there."
With the passage of time, the 78-year-old former president’s speeches have grown darker, harsher, longer, angrier, less focused, more profane and increasingly fixated on the past, according to a revie...
The Post had a similar story this week. I think he’s finally hit critical mass. And Harris isn’t making any solid missteps they can jump on
He's brain-broke, and the GOP has known that for the last six or eight months. But they put off removing and replacing him on the ticket because they knew they'd lose the MAGA vote. Now it's too late. So the Republicans' presidential candidate is a badly demented old man who babbles like a child! 😒
There's so much wrong with Trump it's hard for one thing to dominate the narrative. It's like the saying about one death being a tragedy and a thousand being a statistic, only with scandal and incompetence instead.
TBH, less than 1% of the electorate reads the NYT. Now if Sinclair threw him under the bus...
So what are you suggesting? They should take a group of people who've all voted straight Democratic tickets since 1980, but who claim to be "undecided," and interview them about how they aren't sure Trump has the mental stamina to be president at his age? (To be clear, I'd be in favor if they did.)