BLUE
Profile banner
LK
Laura-Isabelle Klatt
@lauraklatt.bsky.social
Post-doctoral researcher at IfaDo. Interested in the multifaceted interplay between attention, working memory, and multisensory processing 🧠 lauraklatt.github.io/
252 followers176 following66 posts
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

I usually try to have very detailed to do lists to sort of ‘offload’ what’s on my mind and then I try to have a structured plan for the day and the week on when I do certain things. It helps sometimes.

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

No great tips. But maybe it helps to know that I can relate! Sometimes I get so overwhelmed by all the things on my to do list, I start doing one thing, but can’t stop asking myself if I should rather be doing one of the other things on my list, resulting in me just not being focused. It’s messy!

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

Will arrive tomorrow! 🙌 I’ll see you at the JuWi meeting!

0
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

If you want to find out how EEG-correlates of auditory spatial attention are affected by odorant-stimulation, check out our pre-print. We have some cool alpha lateralization results and show how MVPA decoding of sound location is affect by odorant-stimulation. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

Behavior and alpha-band oscillations reveal cross-modal interactions between chemosensory and auditory processing
Behavior and alpha-band oscillations reveal cross-modal interactions between chemosensory and auditory processing

bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution

0
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

The more discnerable sound cues got (i.e., with stronger sound lateralization), the influence of odorant-stimulation decreased.

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

Notably, this effect was only robust in the 2nd half of the sound sequence, suggesting an after-effect of odorant stimulation. Our results replicate a previous report of odorant-induced sound localization bias under slightly different conditions (Liang et al., 2022, Chem. Seses).

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

Behaviorally, at central sound positions (= auditory cues maximally ambiguous), participants were more likely to categorize a sound as coming from the right with concurrent right-nostril stimulation, while the proportion of left-responses increased with left-nostril stimulation.

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

We also included auditory-only sequences as a control condition. In all types of sequences, the sounds were played from different locations. Importantly, sometimes the sounds originated from the center - this was not known to participants! The loudspeakers weren't visible.

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

Then, participants completed a dynamic sound localization paradigm with repeated sequences of 8 sounds. After each sound, they made a left vs. right judgment about the sound position. In the first half of the sequence, we concurrently stimulated their left, right or both nostrils

1
LKlauraklatt.bsky.social

First, using an odorant localization task, we made sure, participants received a concentration of isopropanol (smells like hand sanitizer) at which they were able to differentiate between left- and right-nostril stimulation.

1
Profile banner
LK
Laura-Isabelle Klatt
@lauraklatt.bsky.social
Post-doctoral researcher at IfaDo. Interested in the multifaceted interplay between attention, working memory, and multisensory processing 🧠 lauraklatt.github.io/
252 followers176 following66 posts