When I was a law clerk in Oregon in the late ‘90s, I did an appellate case with one of these dudes and MY GOSH did he have arguments. “You didn’t serve me with notice because my name now has a comma in it and you didn’t have the comma.” Hoo boy. “You can’t make me have a driver’s license,” etc.
I also saw one in an Alaska case and it took me SO FUCKING LONG to try to wrap my head around what the argument was because there WAS so much extraneous fuckery but he did win the appeal
Tagging in @sailormoondamus.bsky.social, the ultimate sovcit expert.
Like, I have literally no idea what this guy’s deal was, but having guns and all manner of … invented documents does not surprise me, particularly. There’s a fine line between a fake passport and an “I made my own passport because I am entitled” passport.
Linda, did you ever read the opinion in Meads v. Meads, probably the greatest prose ever inspired by a Canadian divorce case? macleans.ca/politics/cou...
A judge's evisceration of the so-called "Freemen" movement may go down as a masterpiece